An analysis on the US-UK relationship through the 20th century Essay

An analysis on the US-UK relationship through the 20th century - Essay Example The award also significantly reiterated the special relationship between the UK and the United States that has been commenced earlier in the century when both fought together as allies in World War II. While the US-UK relationship seemed to gather different views from political scientists and analysts regarding its extent as to whether it is based on friendship or simply for being allies, it is herein argued that the US- UK relationship is based on the two country's special alliance, which continues to exist because of mutual benefits and advantages, and which can be dismantled should these benefits and advantages cease to exist. This view is supported by contentions based on an analysis of the US- UK relationship through the 20th century with consideration on the history of the Anglo- American relationship, the factors that joined and continues to bind the The link between Great Britain and the United States as two separate and distinct nations originally started as a hostile relationship, such as has been commenced in the American Revolutionary War where the United States originally struggled against the political and economic policies of Great Britain as the thirteen British colonies. The years that followed after America gained its independence in the American Revolutionary War were marked by several wars and disputes between the two countries among which included the War of 1812 which took place, in part, because of impressments of American sailors by the Royal Navy, and because of trade embargoes by the British during the Napoleonic Wars. The disputes were appeased following the 1814 conclusion of the Treaty of Ghent which have settled nothing on the issues and causes of the British- American war but has been greatly considered to have accomplished much in that the presentation of divergent views at Ghent in 1814 greatly facilita ted future negotiations between the two countries (Hill 128). The years following the Ghent treaty were still marked with disputes but the two nations were able to settle their differences through negotiations. The twist in the hostile relationship, however, commenced during World War I when the United States helped the Allied Powers, led by Russia, France and the United Kingdom fight against the Central Powers by providing money, food and other needs to the Allied armies. The relationship later developed as a strong alliance during the Second World War during which the United States abandoned its neutrality and already took more roles in the war. In what can be YourSurname 3 considered as Britain's worst fight, America's decision to enter the war and fight on the side of Britain was an assurance that victory is on the side of Britain. There therefore resulted an awareness that victory depended on the United States and which became the foundation of every major decision the British

Business Law (sales) Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Business Law (sales) - Essay Example fficers of the dealer to verify if what the salesman is saying is true and to assert his right properly, the employer Happy Harry must be presumed to know that because the case facts says: â€Å" On August 29, 2002, Happy Harry notified Willie Rammit that his car had arrived that he could pick up the car whenever he wanted to but the sooner he did, the happier Harry would be.† This indicates prior knowledge on the part Harry to get Willie to get the car before August 30, the original delivery date; hence the employer could be faulted here for bad faith given what happened after wards.† B. Identify the legal theory on which Willie rely as the basis for his lawsuit, explain how the required elements of that theory apply to facts of Willie’s lawsuit. Will Willie succeed in his lawsuit? The legal theory on which Willie rely as basis of lawsuit is contractual negligence. There was negligence on the part of the manufacturer by forcing the buyer, through the salesman, to bring home the car. Although the car was not as per customer’s requirement, it does not justify the seller to be negligent in the product it made to sell from the manufacturer. The case facts say that it was the car engine that caused the fire and more over, Willie could not come out from the car to save himself and that the car was also the immediate cause why Willie was not able to get away from danger even assuming that the fire was an accident. The case facts are clear: â€Å"Willie left with the car and began driving to his home. Approximately thirty (30 minutes) while he was still driving home, the engine of the car caught fire and Willie was trapped inside the car because he could not get his seat belt unfastened due to the fact that the buckle was stuck and would not unlatch. As a result of being stuck in the belt, Willie was severely burned over seventy percent of his body. He was hospitalized with his burns for five (5) months.† For negligence to be used as basis of liability,